CONFLICT · LAW FIRM
½ day → 10 min
Madam Wan · Senior Partner, Law Firm, China
BEFOREA recurring conflict cost half a day and a sleepless night.
AFTERSettled in one 10-minute conversation.
Results
What changes when you read your people.
Real client results first. Then two worked examples of X-Map in practice.
3client results, shared with permission
3 countriesMalaysia · Singapore · China
2worked examples of the method
Client results
Shared with permissionMANAGEMENT TEAM · D’CONCEPT
Debate → decisions
D’Concept · Management team, Malaysia
BEFOREThe monthly management meeting re-ran the same debate.
AFTERIt now ends in decisions, with cost savings and new business ideas.
Decisions every monthCost savedBusiness ideas
TEAM MEETINGS · F&B
Conflict → clarity
Coffee company · Singapore
BEFORETeam meetings kept ending in conflict, and nobody could say why.
AFTER“We finally understand why our meetings kept ending in conflicts.”
NEXT RESULT
Could be your team.
Tell us the hire or the team on your mind. We’ll tell you what we’d look at first.
Book a 20-min call →How it works in practice.
Two worked examples from our advisory practice. Names and details are changed. They show the method, not a client result.
Two strong finalists. Which one will actually work with your team?
A Malaysian SME is hiring a Senior Sales Manager. The role reports to a Type 8 CEO and works daily with a Type 6 Head of Ops. Ravi (Type 3) is a polished, fast closer. Mei Ling (Type 1) is steady and builds systems.
Ravi looks like a star to the CEO and a problem to the Head of Ops. That’s the classic halo hire.
X-Map doesn’t pick. It shows which conversations to have before the offer, whoever you hire.
Read the full case →FIT WITH
Ravi · Type 3
Mei Ling · Type 1
CEOType 8
12/18
Strong fit
5/18
Needs effort
Head of OpsType 6
7/18
Most friction
14/18
Strong fit
Number of the 18 work dimensions where each pair naturally lines up.
IF YOU HIRE RAVISet up the Ops relationship before day one. Weekly Ravi ↔ Ops check-ins.
IF YOU HIRE MEI LINGTell the CEO: slower for 90 days, then the most accurate forecast you’ve had.
A Type 3 sales manager, a Type 6 team, and two reps on their way out.
B2B services11 people90 days
“I thought I had a motivation problem. I actually had a translation problem.”
The sales manager
THE PATTERN
He read their hesitation as “no ambition.” They read his speed as “no plan.” Every Monday ended with him frustrated and the team anxious.
WHAT CHANGED
Priorities framed as scenarios, not just targets. Feedback with context, not verdicts. The first five minutes of every meeting slowed down.
Week 6attrition risk reversed
Week 12pipeline conversion up
Your team could be
the next result.
Daniel Yeo or Simyee Lim replies personally, usually within one working day.